Every published figure, with its source

Review removal pricing compared, and why most of this market publishes nothing.

Four services in this market publish a figure on their own site. The rest quote per case behind a form, which is why the numbers you find in comparisons are usually what customers reported rather than what anybody announced. The table below keeps those two kinds of figure apart and names the source of each one. Prices were last checked against the vendors’ own sites in 22 September 2026, except where a row says otherwise.

Run the free audit Compare the services →

What each service charges

Read the source column before the price column. A figure a company printed on its own page and a figure customers told a review site are not the same kind of fact, and the second kind is the one that moves when you actually ask for a quote.

Service	Price	Where the figure came from
RepuShield	$150 to $250 per review	Published on our own pricing page. Fixed before filing, billed only after Google removes the review.
BHMarketer.ai	$125 per review	Published on bhmarketer.ai's own Google Review Removal page, read 24 September 2026. Source
RapidRemove	From $179 per review, or $495 to delete a profile	Published on rapid-remove.com's own homepage, read 26 October 2026. Prices stated excluding VAT. A profile removal plus a new profile is listed at $950. Source
RepSolver	$675, or $525 for contractors	RepSolver's own cost guide. Membership at $150 a month brings removals to about half price. Source
Removify	$500 to $2,500 (reported by users)	Not published by Removify. User-reported range in TrueReview's comparison, May 2026. Source
Erase.com and Guaranteed Removals	$500 to $2,000 (reported by users)	Not published by either brand. TrueReview's May 2026 comparison lists Erase.com at $500 to $2,000 and Guaranteed Removals at $500 to $1,000+. Source
Unreview	Not published	Quoted per review after an assessment. No figure on unreview.com.

Two of the companies above block automated and ordinary browser visits to their own sites, so nobody here has been able to read their current pages. Where that is the case, the row says the figure is user-reported rather than published, because a refused visit is not the same thing as a published price.

Two sheets of paper laid side by side on a plain desk under even light.

Per review, per case, or per month

Three pricing shapes exist in this market and they are not comparable until you convert them. Per review is the easiest to read: a figure, one review, done. Per case is a figure covering an unstated number of reviews, so it only becomes a number you can compare once you know the count it assumes, which is usually the thing a quote leaves out. Per month is a seat on a reputation platform, billed whether or not anything comes down that month.

The platforms are a separate product rather than an expensive version of the same one. A seat buys review collection, monitoring, dashboards and inboxes across many sites. If what you have is one review on one Google listing, almost none of that spend is pointed at your problem.

Our own side of it: Each review gets its own price on a five-step ladder from $150 to $250. A review with a clear policy breach is quicker to argue than a well-written review with no obvious breach, so it sits lower on the ladder. You see the price next to every review before anything is filed, and that price does not change. If Google keeps the review up, you owe nothing for it.

Buying from outside the United States adds two things to every figure above. One is the exchange rate, because this market quotes in dollars almost without exception, ours included. The other is tax: at least one European vendor in the table publishes prices net, so its page figure is not its invoice figure. What that looks like in practice is set out for businesses trading in the UK and for businesses trading in Australia, where the local incumbent is also different.

Before you compare quotes

Four questions that make two quotes comparable

Is the figure per review or per case? A single price covering an unspecified number of reviews cannot be compared with anything
When does the money move, at checkout or after Google removes the review? On a review that never qualified, those two cost very different amounts
Is the figure net or gross? At least one vendor in the table below publishes net prices, so VAT sits on top of what you read
Which policy clause would the filing name for one specific review of yours? A precise answer means somebody read it

Numbers that look like prices and are not

Pricing pages in this market carry a lot of figures. These four turn up most often, and none of them tells you what you will pay or what you will get.

A success rate with no date and no denominator beside it. It is a number, not a measurement
A turnaround time. The queue belongs to Google, so nobody outside Google is in a position to promise one
A customer rating of the vendor. A 5.0 from 300 customers tells you how the sales process felt, not how many filings succeeded
A client count. “10,000+ businesses” with no period attached is a claim about an unspecified span of time

We publish no success rate and no turnaround, because we cannot yet publish the sample behind either one. Google makes the final call on every removal, so what any service in this table is selling is the quality of the case rather than the decision.

The cheapest step is finding out which reviews have an argument at all.

Before you weigh any quote, it is worth knowing how many of your reviews break a published clause. The audit reads every review on the listing, names the clause each filing would rely on, and prices them one at a time. No card, no call.

Run the free audit

If you are comparing services

What each service files on, how they bill, and what they will not touch. We are one of the services being compared, and we say so on every one of these pages.

The policy clause behind each of these

Every pattern above maps to a published Google content-policy category. These pages quote the clause and show the evidence that clears it.